Supreme Court of India imposes costs on Builder for jumping queue in writ petition

On Thursday, the Supreme Court of India passed a judgment in the case of IS Infrastructure and Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs Government of Maharashtra and Anr. The Court imposed costs of ₹1,50,000 on the petitioner for filing a petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to the Bombay High Court.

A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Rajesh Bindal noted that fifteen- to twenty-year-old appeals were pending before the High Court where the builder’s appeal was also pending. The apex court, therefore, deprecated the petitioner’s attempt to jump the queue, stating that a litigant who can afford to approach the Supreme Court cannot be prioritized over other litigants. It added that this was nothing but an abuse of the process of law.

The Court stated, “We deprecate the attempt made by the petitioner to jump the queue by approaching this Court in this manner. A litigant who can afford to approach this Court in this manner cannot get priority over other older cases. Filing such petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is nothing but an abuse of the process of law.”

After arguing the petition, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the plea. The Court permitted withdrawal but imposed costs of ₹1,50,000 payable by the petitioner to the Maharashtra Legal Services Authority within six weeks.

The Court’s decision serves as a reminder that the judicial process is meant to be followed and respected, and that no one should be allowed to jump the queue.