Delhi Government Granted Control Over Services Except Land, Police and Law & Order: Supreme Court
On Thursday, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment in the case of Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India.
The Court held that the Delhi government would have control over all services in the national capital, including the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), except those pertaining to land, police and law and order.
A Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha unanimously ruled that the legislative power of NCT Delhi under Entry 41 would extend to IAS and it shall control them even if they are not recruited by the NCT Delhi. However, it would not extend to the services which come under land, law and order and police.
Explaining the reason behind its decision, the Court said that,
- The Lieutenant Governor (LG) shall exercise powers under the administrative role as entrusted by the President. Executive administration can only extend to matters which fall outside the scope of the legislative assembly and it cannot mean administration over entire NCT Delhi.
- Otherwise, the purpose of having a separate elected body in Delhi will be rendered futile.
- Democratically elected government shall have control over its officers.
- If a democratically elected government is not allowed to control its officers and hold them to account, then its responsibility towards the legislature and public is diluted.
- If officers are not responding to the government, the collective responsibility is diluted.
- If officers feel they are insulated from the elected government, they feel they are not accountable.
The judgment stated that while a state or union territory has the power to make laws on subjects under the Concurrent List, the same will be subject to the existing Central law. At the same time, it has to be ensured that the governance of states is not taken over by the Central government, the Bench opined.
In a case that arose in 2018, when a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court had interpreted Article 239AA of the Constitution, which contains special provisions with respect to the National Capital Territory (NCT). The peculiar status of the NCT and the powers of the Delhi Legislative Assembly and the LG and their interplay were debated in the case. The Court in that judgment had ruled that the LG cannot act independently without the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and has to work harmoniously with the NCT government.
The appeals relating to individual aspects including services were then placed before a regular bench for adjudication based on the Constitution Bench judgment. The regular bench had on April 14, 2019, pronounced its verdict on various individual aspects relating to the tussle between the Delhi government and the LG.
However, the two judges on the Bench – Justices AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan – had differed on the issue of ‘services’ under Schedule VII, List II, Entry 41 of the Constitution of India. The issue considered by the Court was whether the exclusion of “services” relatable to Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule from the legislative and executive domain of the NCT of Delhi, vide a notification of the Government of India dated May 21, 2015, is unconstitutional and illegal.
Since the judges differed, that aspect was referred to a three-judge bench. This new bench then referred the matter to the Constitution Bench on the Centre’s request.
The primary basis of the prayer to refer it to a five-judge bench was that the majority judgment of the Constitution Bench did not consider the purpose and intent of the expression “insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories” as it occurs in Article 239AA(3) of the Constitution, which is the pivotal and crucial aspect of the said provision.
The Supreme Court’s judgment in this case has far-reaching implications for the governance of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. The Court has made it clear that the Delhi government has control over all services in the national capital, except those pertaining to land, police and law and order. This judgment is a major victory for the democratically elected government of Delhi and will ensure that the elected government is able to exercise its power and authority over its officers and hold them to account.(alert-success)
Tags
- Opportunities
- News
- Opportunities for Students
- All High Courts
- Supreme Court of India
- Job Openings
- Top Stories
- Internships
- Delhi High Court
- Call for Papers
- Bail Matters
- Political
- Issues
- Moot Courts
- Judiciary
- Criminal Law
- Bombay High Court
- Employment
- Media & Films
- Business
- Competitions
- Madras High Court
- Matrimonial
- Medical
- Allahabad High Court
- District Courts
- Education
- Kerala High Court
- Money Laundering
- Transportation
- Advocacy
- Calcutta High Court
- Karnataka High Court
- Trademarks & Patents
- Tribunals & Authorities
- Articles
- Consumer
- Enviornment
- Events
- Gaming
- Governance
- Jammu & Kashmir High Court
- Land Acquisition
- Taxation
- Aviation
- Civil Law
- Electricity
- Jurisdiction
- Meghalaya High Court
- Punjab & Haryana High Court
- Sports
- Advertising
- Andhra Pradesh High Court
- Arbitration
- Finance
- Guahati High Court
- Gujarat High Court
- Himachal Pradesh High Court
- Insurance
- Jharkhand
- Kerala
- Loans & Defaults
- Madhya Pradesh High Court
- NGOs
- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
- National Green Tribunal
- Patna High Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Telangana High Court
- Uttarakhand High Court
Follow Nyaysha
Fresh legal updates across our platforms — follow wherever you already scroll.
LinkedInJudgments, appointments & career moves — for professionals Follow Instagram@nyaysha.in — visual explainers, reels & court-room snapshots Follow FacebookCommunity discussions & week-in-review roundups Follow