All High Courts

SC orders transfer of case against TMC Leader Abhishek Banerjee to new judge in response to HC Judge's conduct

SC orders transfer of case against TMC Leader Abhishek Banerjee to new judge in response to HC Judge's conduct

On Friday, the Supreme Court of India issued an order in relation to the school-for-jobs case pending before Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of the Calcutta High Court. The order was in response to a plea filed by Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee against the High Court’s order calling for a probe against him by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

The Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha, noted that Justice Gangopadhyay had given an interview to news channel ABP Ananda regarding Banerjee even as the case concerning Banerjee was being heard by the judge. The bench thus directed the Hon’ble admin Chief Justice to reassign the pending proceedings in the case to some other judge of the Calcutta High Court. The judge to whom proceedings are reassigned would be at liberty to take up all applications moved in that regard.

The Supreme Court had earlier stayed the April 13 judgment ordering a probe by the central agencies into Banerjee’s alleged role in irregularities in recruitment of teaching and non-teaching staff at government schools. During a public meeting on March 29, Banerjee had alleged that persons in ED and CBI custody were pressurized into naming him as part of the case. Subsequently, another accused in the case, Kuntal Ghosh, had also alleged that he was being pressured by investigators to take the name of Banerjee.

An appeal was filed claiming that the High Court cast “unsubstantiated aspersions” on Banerjee and effectively directed the CBI and ED to initiate investigation against him, despite the fact that he was neither a party nor connected to the writ petition being heard. Banerjee in his plea further highlighted that Justice Gangopadhyay had expressed his dislike for the TMC leader in an interview given to a news channel last September.

It was also claimed that the judge had made remarks against Supreme Court judges who were hearing appeals against his order in the case. During a hearing, Justice Gangopadhyay had reportedly asked in open court, “Supreme Court judges can do whatever they want? Is this a Zamindari?” Banerjee moved the apex court stating, “The fact that judicial orders passed by the highest court of the land, are not only under scrutiny but criticism in the most cavalier manner by the said Ld. Single Judge, calls for intervention by this Hon’ble Court so as to ensure that the majesty of the Institution is maintained and the faith which a common man deposes in it stands strong.”

During the hearing of the matter on April 24, the apex court had called for a report from the Calcutta High Court. It had taken exception to Justice Gangopadhyay’s conduct and said that judges have no business giving television interviews to news channels on pending matters and if they were to do so, the concerned judge could not hear the case discussed. Pursuant to the order passed that day, the High Court submitted its report.

Based on the report, the Supreme Court on Friday ordered that the proceedings pending before Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of Calcutta High Court against Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee in relation to the school-for-jobs case, be transferred to some other judge. The order was passed to ensure that the majesty of the Institution is maintained and the faith which a common man deposes in it stands strong.

Case: Abhishek Banerjee vs. Soumen Nandy
Counsel for Applicant: Adv. Udayaditya Banerjee
Counsel for Opposite Party: Adv. Rauf Rahim and Others
Order Date: 28.04.2023 
Read Order: Not Available
WhatsApp Channel

Nyaysha on WhatsApp

Judgments, jobs and legal analysis — the day in law, delivered straight to your WhatsApp. One tap to follow, leave anytime.

We use cookies to improve your experience. Read our cookie policy.